Jul 2006
Per-plaxo-ed
Monday - July 31, 2006 Filed in: Strategy
| Venture
Capital
I am perplexed about Plaxo. With so many
hot-shots of the Silicon Valley VC elite on the
board, including Michael Moritz from Sequoia, Tim
Koogle of Yahoo! and Ram Shriram of Sherpalo, this
company still seems to be looking for its identity
and even worse, its strategy.
Since the Mac beta version was released just
recently, I took a moment to try it out. But without
going into detail about that disappointing
experience, let me tell you how I achieved Plaxo
nirvana without it. For over two years I 'abuse'
LinkedIn in a way that tops the Plaxo service: every
now and then I re-upload all my 2600-and-growing
contacts to LinkedIn and then export the whole list
back out as a group v-card. The Mac address book will
then import those and politely ask me to update the
existing contacts. Voila, all contacts are up to date
from a single source.
LinkedIn is much more than contacts however, it draws in users that want to connect with others based on past experiences and then exchange their contact information. So, Linkedin is essentially the application on top of a contact database. With 10 Million users Plaxo better figure out real fast what the application on top of it looks like, LinkedIn is moving upstream to a higher value proposition but has an opportunity to move downstream and squash Plaxo whenever it feels like.
So who is not paying attention here?
LinkedIn is much more than contacts however, it draws in users that want to connect with others based on past experiences and then exchange their contact information. So, Linkedin is essentially the application on top of a contact database. With 10 Million users Plaxo better figure out real fast what the application on top of it looks like, LinkedIn is moving upstream to a higher value proposition but has an opportunity to move downstream and squash Plaxo whenever it feels like.
So who is not paying attention here?
BlackBerry just got a make-over (by Cingular)
Thursday - July 27, 2006 Filed in: Mobile | Consumer
Technology
Having tested a ton of phones, PDA's etc over the years, the 7130c is a very attractive competitor to the bulky Palm Treo 650 and ... certainly more usable. The small dimensions of the 7130c cuts the size of the older Blackberry almost in half, a little thicker than the Motorola RAZR (which I love) and a bit taller, the 7130c still fits in the pocket of my pants easily. I like it so much, that I decided to get rid of my old Blackberry (on eBay) and my RAZR (although I'll keep it around, just in case) and combine two capabilities into one.
The 7130c with EDGE internet connectivity is actually fast enough to make it a delight to browse the internet (and visit the WAP site of CNN) and read e-mail, while waiting for the traffic light to turn green. The industrial design is good enough (not great) and appealing, the screen that is clearly visible in bright sunlight and adjusts automatically to your surroundings. This is absolutely the best screen I've ever seen on a mobile device.
Phone services are integrated into the PDA capabilities, but this part could be more intuitive. The heritage of the scroll menus from the Blackberry PDA platform complicates things beyond what is necessary. More 'special purpose' buttons would solve the problem. For now however, the Blackberry 7130c has become my new one-eyed king in the land of the blind.
Web 2.0: a technology foundation for free-markets
We believe it describes a set of technologies to support the immense popularity and growth characteristics of free-markets.
Free markets have been in existence at least since 1637, when dutch growers imported Tulips from Turkey and engaged in heavy bidding wars with buyers at the onset of the flower markets. [In the interest of "full-disclosure"; I grew up in Holland].
The Dutch auction (also referred to as "The Essence of Fairness" with respect to IPO markets) was created when ample supply was met with equally impressive demand, and a unique trading mechanism was developed. Apart from the details of the trading options (which eBay has adopted), we want to focus here on the dynamics of the market that are so different from the technology industry in its current incarnation.
The technology industry (still in an immature state) has built success around companies that identify and carve out a one-to-many relationship with customers. Successful companies like Microsoft, Oracle, Cisco etc. staved off early competition and now act as the single asset owner of the technology they sell to many customers, fearing little organic competition. We call them what they are; demi-cartels. A great position to be in and very profitable, but the technology market is about to get a shakeup, not dissimilar to what happened in the flower markets.
The creation and composition of technology assets, whether those assets are applications, databases, code or new media content, is emerging from the hands of specialists into the realm of a much broader set of providers.
Suddenly, the technology industry faces competition it has never seen before. And it is responding by changing its tactics [
New many-to-many market models arise and dramatically impact the old rules of the game. New content establishes micro-celebrities that drive the popularity of a free-market technology platform. The Pareto principle is dead (well, not really - its amplitude will change).
So, Web 2.0 is a platform strategy (rather than a proprietary stack) that enables many-to-many relationships between buyers and sellers of electronic assets. When transparency and integrity are key objectives in the creation of these marketplaces, Web2.0, with whatever technologies that represents, actually has a chance of becoming a buzzword we can speak fondly about.



